Cass’ “solution” is the “Constitution Restoration Act,” a bill relentlessly promoted during the conference that authorizes Congress to impeach judges who fail to abide by “the standard of good behavior” required by the Constitution. If they refuse to acknowledge “God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government,” or rely in any way on international law in their rulings, judges also invite impeachment. In essence, the bill would turn judges’ gavels into mere instruments of “The Hammer,” Tom DeLay, and Christian-right cadres.
Since 1992, the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression has celebrated the birth and ideals of its namesake by calling attention to those who in the past year forgot or disregarded Mr. Jefferson’s admonition that freedom of speech “cannot be limited without being lost.”
THE 2005 JEFFERSON MUZZLES GO TO …
The Federal Communications Commission
“You don’t know where the line is, and that’s what’ s scaring people.” — John Ridley, novelist and writer for television and film
The Democratic and Republican National Parties
“One cannot conceive of what other design elements could be put into a space to create a more symbolic affront to the role of free expression.” — U. S. District Court Judge Douglas Woodlock, commenting on the “free speech zone” for political protestors at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston
School officials at Poway (CA) High School, Climax (MN) Public School District, and Russell (KY) High School
“Your faith is great, but when your faith is offensive, you need to leave it in the car” — Officials at Poway (CA) High School in justifying a ban on a student’s wearing to school a T-shirt that read “Homosexuality Is Shameful”
The (Motion Picture) Classification and Rating Administration
“Our characters are made of wood and have no genitalia…all they’d get is splinters.” — Scott Rudin, producer of the movie Team America
High School of Legal Studies in Brooklyn (NY)
“What bozo tried to hold back a diploma in a country where freedom of speech is so prized, I don’t know.” — Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
The National Stock Car Racing Commission (NASCAR)
“It don’t mean shit right now. Daddy’s won here ten times.” — Dale Earnhardt, Jr. (responding to a reporter’s question about the significance of his win moments after winning his fifth victory at Talladega Superspeedway in October 2004)
The U.S. Marshals Service
“You are correct that the action was not taken at my direction; I was as upset as you were.” — Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
The United States Department of State and The United States Department of Homeland Security
“Restricting access of Cuban academics to the United States is consistent with the overall tightening of our policy” — Darla Jordan, U.S. State Department spokesperson, explaining the denial of visas to all 61 Cuban scholars scheduled to participate in the international congress of the Latin American Studies Association
The Virginia House of Delegates
“Please let these kids express themselves. It’ll pass on. Don’t fine these young kids.” — Virginia House of Delegate Lionell Spruill
Alabama State Representative Gerald Allen
“Half the books in the library could end up being banned. It’s all based on how one interprets the material.” — Juanita Owes, director of Montgomery City County Library, commenting on a bill proposed in the Alabama House of Representatives
Georgia State Representative Ben Bridges
“It’s in the book that [evolution is] a theory, but these teachers teach it like it’s a fact…. Let’s teach them the truth or don’t teach them anything.” — Georgia State Representative Ben Bridges
Berkmar High School (Georgia) Principal Kendall Johnson
“We wanted to run a ‘censored’ stamp on the page. But Mr. Johnson censored our ‘censored’ stamp…” — Kelly Shaul, Student Copy Editor of the student-run Berkmar High School newspaper, The Liberty
What’s striking is how weak the case for the PATRIOT Act’s vital necessity as an anti-terror measure appears even when we focus on the Department of Justice’s handpicked examples, as provided in their “Report from the Field.” Law enforcement’s proud displays of PATRIOT’s effectiveness involve drug interdiction, computer hackings, child pornography, gambling, and a variety of other crimes notable for not being terrorism.
Contraception doesn’t belong behind the counter; it belongs over-the-counter. A woman’s access shouldn’t hinge on whether she has health insurance, whether she has a doctor she can call at 5 a.m., or how her neighbors feel about the culture of life. Women should be able to order stacks of the stuff off of the internet to keep in their medicine cabinets, and pharmacists should be free to keep their drugstores clear of anything they find morally questionable. Pharmacy owners should be equally free to work out their own individual policies — and employ workers who agree to abide by them.
What is it about my shows and “American Idol” and “Amazing Race,” which are doing so well in 18-to-34? I think it’s the fact that the audience is not being preached to. What Jon Stewart clearly is doing is conversing with his audience in a humorous way about public affairs. He’s speaking with them. They feel like he’s one of them.
For example, if there were a correspondent on a news show that asked hard questions of the president, as they should, and got kicked out of the White House, I’d love to see them report the next night from outside the gate. It would be like, “Hey, it’s Joe Shmo, and as you know, I’m not allowed in there, but here’s where I’m reporting today.” I’d cut back to him each night until they let him back in. It would galvanize ratings.
The latest example is Zimbabwe’s March 31 parliamentary elections, in which Mr. Mugabe’s ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front Party thrashed its democratic opponents using electoral tactics that were less Queensbury Rules than those of professional wrestling.
Starving voters were told to support the Mugabe party or lose access to food. Village leaders warned that opposition supporters could lose their homes. In 30 races surveyed by the opposition, roughly 180,000 votes appeared after the polls had closed and the official turnout had been reported.
This bill allows us to answer the question: “What if there were a bill that served purely and clearly corporate greed while damaging millions of non-wealthy Americans, would the Democratic Party stand against it? Would the Democratic leadership fight it? Would all members of this purportedly distinct political party vote for people over profits?”
In the Senate, the answer is clearly no. In the House, things are uncertain. The vote is scheduled for next week.